Be it a case of forgery, dowry, land tenant problems, accidents or any other matter requiring legal intervention, one has to approach the legal luminaries whose base is advocates. In a busy and bustling city like Delhi it is very frequent that people get into trouble for which legal action is required. In such fast paced life it is essential to have adequate knowledge about the procedures and processes to file complaints and proceed in a lawful way. Since all of us have not read the law thus taking help of Delhi advocates becomes impertinent.
Advocates in Delhi are responsible for maintaining the code of law and look after the aggrieved. In their forward march towards transforming justice delivery system and making it paperless and hassle free, the Delhi High Court has recently launched the e-court fee system. The new e-fee court system at the Delhi high court premises allows cutting off the difficulty and delaying in filing cases. This has been made possible by the unending endeavor by Government of Delhi and the Computer Committee of Delhi High Court. The computer committee of Delhi high court is headed by Justice B.D. Ahmed. The committee in 2008 had launched a project in cooperation with Delhi Government in order to make the abode of Delhi advocates an electronic court. This was done to ensure reduction in use of paper and thereby making filing and disposal of cases far easier.
Advocates or barristers are the pillar of justice and fairness. The recent e-court fee system will make it easier for justice seekers to approach the courts. Also further progress is on to allow the litigants and advocates of Delhi to file for court fee stamps online. This will curtail the long queues which develop in the premises in order to collect the court fee stamps. Now with the new system in place one can in future buy court fee stamps from anywhere and anytime.
Further for the ease of Delhi advocates the plan is to introduce the system in capital’s district courts. This will also require full cooperation of the Delhi government which under the able leadership of Sheila Dikshit is fully ensured. This is so as the government also is looking focused on its agenda to maximize use of computers in administration.
The present Delhi high court chief Justice D. Murugesan was also praiseworthy of the government cooperation in the e-facility system. He was particularly noteworthy of the fact that the system is fail proof and it cannot be tampered with or counterfeited. Also the system is flawlessly customer-friendly. Security is ensured as the moment the litigant files for court fee and the payment is made, a receipt with a unique number is issued. This number is affixed with bar code which at the time of registry can be verified for applying petition. The number is locked as soon as the verification is done. This eliminates the remotest possibility of the reuse of the number.
Advocates of High Court can make the payment through cheque or draft or pay order. They can also use the RTGS system once the system is uploaded online. RTGS stands for Real Time Gross Settlement. RTGS system is a funds transfer mechanism wherein inter bank payment settlements are done through centralized banking system.
Roe v. Wade was decided by the United States Supreme almost four decades ago. Fetal viability is not determined by the number of weeks of gestation, but is evaluated by the Physician who is responsible for terminating the woman’s pregnancy as decided by the Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood vs. Casey. Due to advancement in medical technology, a fetus that is healthy (i.e. no fetal genetic defects, significant fetal abnormalities or anomalies that are incompatible with life) is able to survive at earlier stages of gestation compared to 40 years ago. There is still a significant proportion of children born prematurely or extremely premature (less than 24 weeks) who not only still have a high chance of perinatal mortality, but who will have considerable morbidity which may include significant mental retardation, deafness, blindness, pulmonary problems, poor feeding and higher susceptibility later in life of chronic diseases such as diabetes.
At 28 weeks, the majority of fetuses will survive birth if they are normal. If the fetus is not normal, then each one must be evaluated to determine if the abnormality is associated with a high incidence of mortality and such significant morbidity that may lead to neonatal mortality. In essence; a fetus at 32, 34, or even 36 weeks may be evaluated and found to have fetal genetic defects or fetal abnormalities that would not allow it to survive until birth or die immediately or shortly after birth. It should remain the decision between the mother and her Physician whether she should terminate the pregnancy immediately or proceed to a full term delivery. If the mother has a medical condition where her life is threatened if a delivery does not occur and for her to undergo a C-section may lead to her death, then the decision to terminate the pregnancy to save the mother’s life should remain an option.
For abortion opponents to say that late term abortions are performed for any reason is absolutely false. It is their intent to not reveal the truth so that they can continue their agenda of not only ending Late Term Abortions (terminations of pregnancy after 24 weeks) but to end all abortions.
Scientific claims that viability (the ability of a fetus to live outside the womb by artificial means or otherwise) occurring between 24 to 28 weeks has been diluted by medical progress over the past 3 to 4 decades. There has not been a reduction in the perinatal mortality for children born less than 23 weeks over the past decade, thus substantiating that further decrease in neonatal mortality before this gestational age may not occur. Those born at or more than 23 weeks gestation have had a significant improvement in the perinatal morbidity and mortality over the past 10 years.
Since the medical advances which have allowed a fetus born earlier to survive, opponents of abortion argue that the laws must be changed in order to address the number of weeks viability begins. This issue has already been addressed in the Supreme Court case of Planned Parenthood vs. Casey where the state has an interest in protection of the fetus when viability begins which is determined by the Physician through his or her evaluation of each individual fetus. To say at a certain trimester of pregnancy or a certain gestational age an abortion may not be performed is absolutely improper and not taking into consideration the condition of the patient whose life or health may be threatened or a fetus that has no chance of being born alive or dies shortly after birth is absolutely wrong and improper.
Late-term abortions (after 24 weeks) make up a small percentage of the total number of terminated pregnancies (approx .5%) and it remains a crucial issue for our society. It is a vastly critical issue for women who need to terminate their pregnancy due to medical necessity. It is for this reason that Late Term Abortions must remain legal.
James Scotty – About the author: late term abortion facility Dr. James S. Pendergraft was instrumental in helping to open late term abortion.net regarding services for women, late term abortion clinic, who are in need of a late term abortion procedure.
What inspired someone to turn out to be a lawyer?
I am unable to imagine personally doing a dull thing again and again regardless of how a lot I will be paid for it. High stakes and also desperate men, the thrill of civilized war, the game of chess which is played out every day in the courtroom and also outside of it – is exactly what I love, which is exactly what inspires me, that is the reason I decided to turn out to be a lawyer.
And exactly what a school of life the profession is! The law deals with every part of life. The variance between a civilized society and also an uncivilized one is the laws through which it really is governed and consequently, every aspect of one’s everyday life is regulated by some law or the other. Whenever the sphere is really immense along with the scope therefore diverse, the likelihood of complications, interpretations and also fields of work are virtually limitless.
Inspiration in attorneys may vary, certainly get it done for a social cause, certain do it for fame, certain possess actually done it accidentally ( and have been quite successful too), nearly all get it done for the money, however, I actually do it for the thrill!
Just how did you prepare to enter into this field?
Law colleges provide you with a fleeting glimpse of the numerous spheres of law, but nothing more. Like wine, one turns into better ( and more valuable ) with age ( read experience).
The profession takes severe hard work, an in-depth research and also grasp of the factual and also legal issues involved. Litigation takes quick thinking, outstanding oratory and also articulation expertise and also self-assurance. The pressure on each and every arguing lawyer is immense because a client’s fate depends upon what he/she says ( or doesn’t say ) along with the ability to perform under pressure is required. Participation in public areas speaking contests and also debates could be a terrific way to prepare for life as a litigator.
Unadulterated good sense is exactly what eventually resolves the case. The case is never regarding settling the law; it will be about the parties and also their issues. The law gets resolved as a side-effect, less the primary agenda. It will be therefore important that an attorney cultivates a practical and also solution-oriented approach and also knows the issues of the people he corresponds to.
The laws of India are in essence in English, along with a good command over the language is required if 1 really wants to get anywhere in the profession. This really is equally important during drafting. Simple, useful and also lucid drafting is needed to ensure that no confusion arises in the interpretation of documents later. So exercise the writing expertise if you wish to enter the profession.